La Critríca de arte ha perdido totalmente su función El historiador del arte reflexiona sobre la p intura en la era digital y la dictadura del mercado Otros 11 Guardar Enviar por correo Imprimir IKER SEISDEDOS 20 MAR 2016 - 00:23 CET BERNARDO PÉREZ El profesor de Harvard Benjamin H. D. Buchloh (Colonia, 1941) es uno de los más influyentes historiadores del arte del siglo XX. León de Oro en la Bienal de Venecia de 2007, fue exégeta de los primeros conceptualismos europeos antes de mudarse en los setenta desde Alemania Occidental a Estados Unidos, donde ha intervenido en la esfera pública del arte junto a Rosalind Krauss, Yve-Alain Bois y Hal Foster, coautores del esencial tratado Arte desde 1900 (Akal) y compañeros de la revista October, boletín de pensamiento crítico que, libre de publicidad, edita el Massachussets Institute of Technology (MIT). En el grupo de los últimos mohicanos de la crítica, Buchloh se sitúa en la e
Philosophical Science Print Email Discuss Share Related Articles What is Philosophy of Science Good For? Biotechnologies: Tweaking Here, Tuning There. Is that all we need? Science & Philosophy: A Beautiful Friendship Paul Feyerabend And The Monster ‘Science’ Shock the Monkey Philosophical Astronomy Thinking Straight About Curved Space Hypotheses? Forget About It! After the Science Wars What is a Thought Experiment, Anyhow? Chaos & An Unpredictable Tomorrow Peter Saltzstein finds that Chaos Theory yields unexpected philosophical results. The future is not what it used to be. I mean, an intriguing implication of the branch of mathematics called chaos theory is that the future states of complex dynamical systems such as the weather, the human brain, the stock market, evolution, and history itself, are not what we once thought them to be. Specifically, chaos theory suggests that the behavior of complex systems can f
Why do Americans go out of their way to remove this part of human anatomy, when the rest of the world does not? The male prepuce, or foreskin, is a highly mobile and extraordinarily sensitive double fold of tissue that is the end of the penis. The male prepuce, or foreskin, is a highly mobile and extraordinarily sensitive double fold of tissue that is the end of the penis. Why do Americans go out of their way to remove this part of human anatomy, when the rest of the world does not? Note: Never have I gotten so many comments and emails in response to a blog post, much less rumors that I’m a man. I’ll keep that in mind. And for the record, it wasn’t until 2014 that I had the opportunity to put a man’s intact penis in my very much female vagina. This frictionless appendage made me realize that sex doesn’t have to be painful or cause hazardous inflammation. And with that image in your mind… I was nineteen or twenty years old when a male friend of mine, we’ll call him B
Comments
Post a Comment